4 ms·
Yeah but the press has to make money. They don't want to lose access, ultimately most of them want to be PR contractors for big companies Getting people off of
by 01HNNWZ0MV43FF 1y ago
Yeah but the press has to make money. They don't want to lose access, ultimately most of them want to be PR contractors for big companies
Getting people off of for-profit news would be great, though I admit it's a blue sky proposal
- sherry-sherry 1y agoWhich is why all of them should, every single one. Ones who don't should be called out by others. Same thing at White House press conferences, push push push them relentlessly with questions that make them uncomfortable... make them squirm. Press who always allow the other side to control the narrative deserve to die out. I know this is all easier said than done, but holy crap we are making it so easy for them to walk over us right now, we could at least do something.
- jajuuka 1y agoYeah most companies want good PR for access. Apple takes this to the extreme where the first whiff of negatives things to say and you're cut off. Now you won't get invited to events or given devices early. So you'll have to wait until release and buy it yourself. Then take the time to review a device. By that point most people have already seen the other coverage and made up their mind. So you will get very little motion which translates to income. These corporations have effectively built their own club of chosen mouthpieces who are willing to excuse negatives about a product to make money.
- nebula8804 1y agoWhat if all the youtubers eg. MKBHD, Justine, etc. all piss off Apple at the same time? Or one big one goes against Apple and others follow as an act of solidarity?
- xethos 1y agoThere's (effectively) a single iPhone to review, and millions that want to be the next major reviewer. I guarantee someone is willing to play ball