3 ms·
Which is why people going back and forth about incentives has always driven me nuts. Attempting to make assurances based on this handle we crank called "human i
by komali2 1y ago
Which is why people going back and forth about incentives has always driven me nuts. Attempting to make assurances based on this handle we crank called "human incentive" that may map to human behavior in the expected direction, the opposite direction, or no direction at all, is madness! We don't know. Humans are unsolved.
Give me guarantees, or the closest approximation. Federation, distribution, dispersion of authority, interoperability.
- andsoitis 1y ago> Give me guarantees, What’s the incentive?
- tempodox 1y agoExactly. As long as this isn’t enforced by laws, it won’t happen. And then there are administrations that get away with just ignoring the law.
- komali2 1y agoYes, exactly, which is why counting laws as a part of the incentive mechanism is wrong to do. "They won't do that because they don't want to break the law." Laws are impossible to perfectly enforce and States are changeling things. Communities should create more dependable guarantees.
- komali2 1y agoWhy do you need one? Or why is there always a presumption of an incentive that maps to capitalist modes? I want decentralization because States oppress people and I want resistance to that to persist, others think like me such as the inventor of the Signal protocol hence why it was invented. If you need to describe that as incentive, cool beans.
- andsoitis 1y ago> Why do you need one? Or why is there always a presumption of an incentive that maps to capitalist modes? it could be that I'm misinterpreting your angle, but I would just point out that "incentives" are not tied to a particular economic model. Incentives are simply things that motivate or encourage people to do something, acting as either a reward for desired behavior or a penalty for unwanted actions.