4 ms·
That's not expensive for what it does. It really isn't. I'd buy one in a snap if I had an application. It's beyond amazingly cheap for a tool of that power. Th
by eckyptang 14y ago
That's not expensive for what it does. It really isn't. I'd buy one in a snap if I had an application. It's beyond amazingly cheap for a tool of that power.
This is comparatively expensive for what it does: http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MC975LL/A http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MC975LL/A
- wtallis 14y agoThat's certainly an expensive laptop, but you really can't say it's comparatively expensive, since it's got more than twice the resolution of any other laptop. There is no direct comparison to be made as yet.
- eckyptang 14y agoIt's got more pixels yes, but that doesn't make it N orders of magnitude more useful.
- forgottenpaswrd 14y ago"It's got more pixels yes, but that doesn't make it N orders of magnitude more useful." FOR YOU!!. People use to believe they really are the center of the Universe, so if they don't find something useful, NOBODY does!! I know some professions in witch it certainly makes it 10*N times more useful.
- gwern 14y agoSuch as?
- eckyptang 14y agoThe only thing I can think of is medical imaging and they use windows.
- freehunter 14y agoI've noticed an increase in immature sounding posts on HN lately. Isn't school back in session yet? What (or witch?) profession finds it 10x more useful to have a laptop with a higher pixel count but still a standard, unimpressive effective resolution?