I never thoughtabout thia beyond analogous (imho) situations, so take this counter with huge grain of salt: Ownership distributions of critical companies have

I never thoughtabout thia beyond analogous (imho) situations, so take this counter with huge grain of salt: Ownership distributions of critical companies have been tried: post-soviet companies were privatized and their shares distributed "fairly" among the population. We know what happend to them afterwards (ownership did not stay distributed for long and I'm not sure it was due to lack of general education). Ultimately isnt the point of private companies (publicaly listed companies included) that it creates a 'us vs them' situation where not everyone is meant to benefits equaly?