3 ms·
Calling the old PA-led status quo “far better” ignores how dysfunctional and destructive it was. The PA was given territory, money, and international legitimacy
by danielbenzvi 1y ago
Calling the old PA-led status quo “far better” ignores how dysfunctional and destructive it was. The PA was given territory, money, and international legitimacy after Oslo, yet instead of building a transparent, functioning state, it became notorious for corruption, power struggles, and failing to deliver basic services. Worse, during that same period, suicide bombings and the Second Intifada erupted under its watch, so for ordinary Israelis, that “status quo” meant buses, cafes, and markets being blown up.
Even for Palestinians, the PA’s rule was hardly a path to peace or progress. Billions in foreign aid were stolen by elites, elections were canceled, dissent was crushed, and everyday life was marked by both authoritarianism and insecurity. So while today’s Hamas reality is undeniably worse, pretending the old PA era was some kind of lost golden path to peace overlooks that it was already a dead end for both peoples.
- michaelbarton 1y agonot detracting from your point, I found this line somewhat describes the current situation in the US right now with the government shutdown “it became notorious for corruption, power struggles, and failing to deliver basic services”
- jhallenworld 1y agoIn other words it was like most governments of the world.
- cropcirclbureau 1y agoHow come you have an account from 2014 and this is the first time you're commenting?
- danielbenzvi 1y agoI’m that old.