Yes of course you don't need to fully endorse someone's politics in these situations. Though _not fully endorsing_ usually implies a disagreement on a minority

Yes of course you don't need to fully endorse someone's politics in these situations. Though _not fully endorsing_ usually implies a disagreement on a minority of points. But here, for any reasonable person, it would be quite the opposite - you have to entirely ignore TR's storied violent criminal past, because you're fond of a march. And as the article linked points out, the speakers at this march were quite extreme. So it's not as if the march is even defensible in isolation. I think DHH is too smart to be ignorant to any of this. (I will say I don't condemn everyone who attended the march, I imagine many went with good intentions)