3 ms·
> You really think this worries Sam Altman? Yes. "Development of superhuman machine intelligence (SMI) is probably the greatest threat to the continued existe
by reducesuffering 1y ago
> You really think this worries Sam Altman?
Yes.
"Development of superhuman machine intelligence (SMI) is probably the greatest threat to the continued existence of humanity. There are other threats that I think are more certain to happen (for example, an engineered virus with a long incubation period and a high mortality rate) but are unlikely to destroy every human in the universe in the way that SMI could." - Sam Altman
He's had more recent statements along these lines. But personally, I believe his fault is that he thinks careening towards this is inevitable and he's hoping the best thing to do given the wildly diverging outcomes likely is just to hope the emerging intelligence will come up with the alignment.
On Hinton: "I actually think the risk is more than 50%, of the existential threat."
https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1dslspe/geoffrey_hinton_says_there_is_more_than_a_50/ https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1dslspe/geoffr...
- BeetleB 1y agoI know Sam says stuff, but I don't think he actually is worried about it. It's to his benefit to say things like this, as he gets to be involved in setting the rules that will ultimately benefit him. As for Hinton: > He said (paraphrased): "I know it's not 0%, and it's not 100%. It's somewhere in between. The number I picked is just how I feel about it." I'm not claiming he's not worried about it. I'm providing context on how he came up with his percentage.
- nemomarx 1y agoI think it's plausible he is lying about believing that in order to get more money from investors