3 ms·
>is a fancy guessing algorithm That's literally what our brains are so I'm not sure what argument you are actually trying to make..
by eatsyourtacos 1y ago
>is a fancy guessing algorithm
That's literally what our brains are so I'm not sure what argument you are actually trying to make..
- sim7c00 1y agoguessing tokens (or something similar) i think humans grasp at more than 1 type of straw. Edit: no ok i get u. ensemble learning is a thing ofc. maybe me n other poster reasoned too much from AI == model..but ofc you combine em these days. which is more humanlike guesser levels. (not nearly enough models now ofc)
- baggachipz 1y agoWe don't have IQs of 300. Would you seriously consider an LLM the same as a human brain?
- esafak 1y agohttps://www.trackingai.org/home https://www.trackingai.org/home Without doubt, LLMs know more than any human, and can act faster. They will soon be smarter than any human. Why does it have to be the same as a human brain? That is irrelevant.
- ACCount37 1y agoThey are implemented on an entirely different substrate. But they are very similar in function. The training process forces this outcome. By necessity, LLMs converge onto something of a similar shape to a human mind. LLMs use the same type of "abstract thinking" as humans do, and even their failures are amusingly humanlike.
- RamtinJ95 1y agoWhat? Who has made this claim, what is the evidence? I don’t think this is true at all.