No, he's still dealing with a flood of crap, even in the last few weeks, off more modern models. It's primarily from people just throwing source code at an LLM

No, he's still dealing with a flood of crap, even in the last few weeks, off more modern models. It's primarily from people just throwing source code at an LLM, asking it to find a vulnerability, and reporting it as-read, without having any actual understanding of if it is or isn't a vulnerability. The difference in this particular case is it's someone who is: 1) Using tools specifically designed for security audits and investigations. 2) Takes the time to read and understand the vulnerability reported, and verifies that it is actually a vulnerability before reporting. Point 2 is the most significant bar that people are woefully failing to meet and wasting a terrific amount of his time. The one that got shared from a couple of weeks ago https://hackerone.com/reports/3340109 https://hackerone.com/reports/3340109 didn't even call curl. It was straight up hallucination.