4 ms·
Notice it was 'a set of tools' They're using it correctly. It's a system of tools, not an autopilot.
by 1970-01-01 1y ago
Notice it was 'a set of tools'
They're using it correctly. It's a system of tools, not an autopilot.
- ragnese 1y agoWell, that's how Mr. Stenberg described it, but he wasn't the one using them. I don't know how the contributor feels about his AI tool(s).
- mos_basik 1y agoI haven't read it yet, but later in the mastodon thread, stenberg says "this is [the contributor's] (long) blog post on his work: https://joshua.hu/llm-engineer-review-sast-security-ai-tools-pentesters https://joshua.hu/llm-engineer-review-sast-security-ai-tools...".
- tptacek 1y agoIt's weird that the discussion has collapsed down to "autopilots" vs. "abstention". I'm thrilled to be converging on an understanding that it instead "people who understand what they're trying to do" vs. "vibe coders".
- nxobject 1y agoIn defense of the cynics, I get the impression in a situation where (a) there's a lot of company marketing hype in such a competitive market that begs cynicism, and (b) we're constantly learning the boundary of trained LLMs can actually do (and can't), as well as unusual emergent workflows, that really do make a difference.
- Timshel 1y agoI did not read it, but this article from the contributor should contain more details: https://joshua.hu/llm-engineer-review-sast-security-ai-tools-pentesters https://joshua.hu/llm-engineer-review-sast-security-ai-tools... (mentioned in https://mastodon.social/@bagder/115241413210606972 https://mastodon.social/@bagder/115241413210606972).