4 ms·

Maybe it's per user?

• hsuduebc2 1y ago
  I believe that is kind of a warning. The major fines based on the global revenue is issued usually by some european institution.
• diggan 1y ago
  Doesn't seem like it: > 5.3. orders Meta Ireland to pay BoE a penalty of €100,000.00 for each day or part thereof that it does not, or does not fully, comply with the orders under 5.1 and/or 5.2, up to a maximum total of €5,000,000.00. Original: > 5.3. veroordeelt Meta Ierland om aan BoE een dangsom te betalen van € 100.000.00 oor iedere dag of gedeelte daarvan dat zij niet of niet volledig aan de beelen onder 5.1 en/of 5.2 oldoet. tot een maximum an in totaal € 5.000.000.00 is bereikt. It seems like usually they start with smaller fines, and if the offense is repeated, they ramp it up. Kind of makes sense.
• markus92 1y ago
  Na, but under the Dutch legal you can go back to the court if they pay the 5 million without changing anything and ask if they can increase it cus it clearly wasn’t enough. They’ll just keep tacking zeroes on.
  • jeroenhd 1y ago
    Yes and no. The judge can choose to tack on zeroes to make Meta comply, but they may also find that monetary fines are not sufficient and take other measures. This is not just a money printing machine you can keep coming back to. If Meta can provide a reasonable time frame for compliance, the judge may also choose to let the existing limit on reparations stand rather than increase it, despite them not complying the day they hit the 5 million euro mark. It's all up to what the judge deems reasonable to make Meta comply with the court's orders.
    • markus92 1y ago
      Exactly, they can’t just pay the 5 million and call it a day.