4 ms·
MR studies rule out the idea that inflammation is the sole causal factor, and we have a lot of them. We have MVMR studies that look at multiple variables http
by cthalupa 1y ago
MR studies rule out the idea that inflammation is the sole causal factor, and we have a lot of them.
We have MVMR studies that look at multiple variables
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article%3Fid%3D10.1371/journal.pmed.1003062 https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article%3Fid%3D10.137...
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanhl/article/PIIS2666-7568(21)00086-6/fulltext https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanhl/article/PIIS2666-75...
Some MR looking specifically at CRP actually dispute the idea of a causal link altogether
https://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.d548 https://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.d548
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.atv.0000258869.48076.14 https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.atv.0000258869.48...
Factorial MR show strong evidence that the risk is additive, in the case of these that look at atherogenic particles and IL-6 signaling
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.121.023277 https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.121.023277
MR looking at specific genes that reduce LDL-C through a variety of mechanisms, including some that lower inflammation, show basically identical reduction of risk per LDL-C lowered.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25770315/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25770315/
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1604304 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1604304