I know this is polemical article is in good fun but chatGPT gives me the impression Descarte should not be counted with the others: https://chatgpt.com/share/6

I know this is polemical article is in good fun but chatGPT gives me the impression Descarte should not be counted with the others: https://chatgpt.com/share/68dd758f-2bc0-8008-955d-a7dbd89399f8 https://chatgpt.com/share/68dd758f-2bc0-8008-955d-a7dbd89399... " Given: - The blog offers no primary evidence for Descartes’s having a proof. - Scholarly histories, based on critical assessment of surviving letters, treat the solution of the area problem as due to Roberval (and independently Torricelli) rather than to Descartes. - The more carefully vetted sources place Descartes in the position of reacting to, or endorsing, Roberval’s result but not of originating it. Therefore, the weight of evidence supports that the historical consensus is correct — Descartes did not solve the area under a cycloid; the blog's claim is likely an overstatement or misinterpretation."