3 ms·
I don’t think you understand how a “continuing resolution” on funding works
by kcplate 1y ago
I don’t think you understand how a “continuing resolution” on funding works
- cosmicgadget 1y agoCare to elaborate?
- amanaplanacanal 1y agoI'm pretty sure I do. Funding is continued at current levels. Then the president just cuts whatever he wants, because the Republican Congress won't force him to obey the laws they pass. Every Republican in Congress is completely spineless, because they are afraid the president might say something bad about them.
- kcplate 1y agoIt takes 60 senate votes to pass the resolution. There are not 60 GOP senate votes. Regarding the resolution, the senate minority can control passage or not if they have at least 40 votes. So everything you said above besides “funding is continued at current levels” has nothing to do with why the government was shut down today. It was shut down today because there were not 10 senate democrats that were willing to vote to continue the existing funding even though they chose to continue the funding earlier in the year.
- amanaplanacanal 1y agoSure. They vote to continue, and then the president cut what he wanted out of it anyway. The Senate Republicans could simply get rid of the filibuster and pass it on their own. They won't, because this way they can blame the Democrats. The Democrats have no power if the Republican Congress won't do their job and make the president obey the law. Blaming the Democrats for this mess is complete bullshit.
- kcplate 1y ago> The Democrats have no power They have filibuster power and power when a supermajority is required, like this situation. However, if you want the power afforded to the majority you need to win elections. You can certainly blame them for failing to elect legislative majorities and losing control of the presidency. That’s all on them.
- amanaplanacanal 1y agoYou keep saying a supermajority is required, when it simply isn't. There is nothing in the constitution or law that requires it. It is simply a custom that the Senate has done it in the past. But it has also been a custom that the president faithfully executes the laws that Congress passes, which this administration doesn't. We'll see what happens after the midterms. I don't expect this president to finish his term.
- kcplate 1y ago> …supermajority is required, when it simply isn’t… It’s the rule they use, are you advocating here for the GOP to use some sort of rule change “nuclear option” to push through the CR? Pretty sure the GOP saw (and warned against) that sort of thing back in 2013. The current makeup of the Supreme Court should give your pause about these “just change the rule” notions. Do you realize that literally what Schumer is trying to do here is to blackmail a political policy on the country that he did not have enough support to get included in the One Big Beautiful Bill right? He is holding government operations hostage because his party lost an election, the majority who were elected passed a bill that was signed into law by Trump that the dems didn’t like. The democrats are literally trying to thwart democracy with this shutdown and people on here are acting like that’s a good thing?
- ModernMech 1y agoThey may not be in the majority, but they won their seats in their own elections which gives them their own power. This era is defined by realpolitik and might-makes-right use of official power. Democrats wielding their (again, legitimate) power to extract maximum leverage to thwart the agenda of the opposing party is exactly how Mitch McConnell played politics. If you're upset about this and claim it's thwarting democracy, then we can have a conversation about replacing Gorsuch with Garland.