4 ms·
not only that but the way that openai and claude have their own foundational models/agents trained to work via CLI, which will basically always be better than j
by bfeynman 1y ago
not only that but the way that openai and claude have their own foundational models/agents trained to work via CLI, which will basically always be better than just cursors gpt wrapper approach.
- esafak 1y agoHow are they trained to work via CLI? You prompt it and it returns response. Where does the CLI come into play?
- throwaway314155 1y agoHave you used Claude Code or OpenAI Codex yet?
- esafak 1y agoYes, daily.
- bfeynman 1y agofrontier labs do finetuning of their models for software dev using the terminal/cli driven style, annotating datasets to solve programming in this fashion, and fine tuning will almost always make for better performance. Cursor as mostly a wrapper is just using the underlying foundation models in their framework and orchestrating on top of that, as opposed to doing actual learnable objectives in training to make things better.