3 ms·
Well I'd have to pay all the friction of writing up a new type, and in some cases the type gets cubersome. Doubly so if your codebase requires extra some fricti
by oreally 1y ago
Well I'd have to pay all the friction of writing up a new type, and in some cases the type gets cubersome. Doubly so if your codebase requires extra some friction like 1 header for each type.
Also get over it. We got post-processor things like static analyzers, etc, and whatever AI code reminders/fixers that are coming up next. I'd prefer those over muddying up the code base.
- Ygg2 1y ago> Also get over it. We got post-processor things like static analyzers, etc, and whatever AI code reminders/fixers that are coming up next. Sure. But unless it's part of compiler, someone will not run it, or will run out of resources (no net or no tokens). Defaults matter a ton.