3 ms·
Duolingo is surely flawed, but realistically I don't see any other way how I could have progressed in French by spending exactly 3 minutes per day with near-zer
by alexey-salmin 1y ago
Duolingo is surely flawed, but realistically I don't see any other way how I could have progressed in French by spending exactly 3 minutes per day with near-zero mental effort. I do it on auto pilot before going to bed, usually being dead tired after work. After 1000 days (so like 50 hours) I can have simple conversations, I can read and I have a rather big vocabulary.
Of course learning in other ways could have given me more in 3 years but the amount of time and efforts would be orders of magnitude bigger, impossible at this point in my life.
I think the trick with Duolingo is to resist the temptation of easy paths the damn app pushes you into.
* Maintain the streak by progressing in the course. Don't redo old lessons, don't do pairs matching or other side quests.
* Ignore XP and leagues and challenges and any other shit.
* Ignore music, math and other courses
* Stick to 1 language, at most 2.
Just do N lessons per day (N=1 for me) and you'll most likely see progress. The lessons are too easy IMO, I rarely make mistakes which is a strong signal. I have to make them harder on purpose: I don't look at the screen to force myself to listen instead of reading, I close the right half of the screen with my palm when I need to do pairs. Even then the progression is too easy and too slow BUT it's a progression.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- vachina 1y agoIt took you 3 years to be A1 level. Duolingo is not a language class, it's more like traditional brute force ML.
- alexey-salmin 1y agoIt's A2, and yes I think it's a very good return on the time and effort I invested: around 50 hours, no homework, no memorization of words or grammar rules. Realistically in my situation it's either this or nothing. I work 55 hours a week, the rest goes into my family and running, I hardly can do anything else.