> they did revoke everyone GitHub access, but with the intent to give it back to some maintainers after they signed some sort of contributor agreement. That so

> they did revoke everyone GitHub access, but with the intent to give it back to some maintainers after they signed some sort of contributor agreement. That sounds like someone or some people spontaneously deciding they're going to become gatekeepers, without any kind of warning and/or Community discussion/agreement first. > Not excusing the extremely poor rollout, but some cleanup was definitely overdue... While true, what they should have done is discuss it with the maintainers _first_ and agree to a plan. Not just seize control, especially from active contributors. :(