GPU accelaration has become so common for new terminals nowadays, that I can't see the point in making that a headline feature. To be fair, the homepage has a m

GPU accelaration has become so common for new terminals nowadays, that I can't see the point in making that a headline feature. To be fair, the homepage has a more generic tagline ("A modern terminal for the 21st century") and a list of items. My problem is that these bullet items also don't say very much: 24-bit color is even more ubiquitous than GPU acceleration. Apparently even the builtin macOS Terminal will support 24-bit color in Tahoe, and I think Windows Terminal has been supporting that since it was released (which is more than 5 years ago). Even image support is kinda old news: many terminals support at the very least Sixel or the iTerm image protocol. Ligatures and splits are also quite common. It would be more interesting if we started comparing terminals by the details of these features, since the devil really is in the details. For instance, not all image protocols are made equal. Sixels are very slow, while the iTerm protocol is quite limited - you have very little control on where the image is placed. The Kitty Graphics protocol is the most advanced protocol, but there are two different image placement methods: positioning, unicode placeholder and relative to other images. Besides that there are a couple of other features such as animation and communicating back with the terminal to get image IDs. I've seen several terminals claiming to have Kitty Image Protocol support, but I've never seen any of them put out a matrix of which features they support (other than Kitty that obviously supports everything). The Kitty Keyboard Protocol is also another thing that is quite complex and I've ran into issues in the past with both iTerm and WezTerm behaving differently than Kitty and running into trouble with some programs which expected the kitty behavior.