4 ms·
From what I understand the majority of the desired spending is on welfare for illegal immigrants. If true, then it's reasonable to push back against it I think.
by lazyeye 1y ago
From what I understand the majority of the desired spending is on welfare for illegal immigrants. If true, then it's reasonable to push back against it I think.
- pseudalopex 1y agoThe Democrats are pushing to continue more generous federal subsidies to help Americans afford Obamacare policies and to reverse deep cuts to Medicaid contained in Trump’s sweeping domestic policy agenda package. But neither of those changes would provide health coverage to undocumented immigrants, since they aren’t eligible for either program.[1] [1] https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/30/politics/fact-check-trump-free-health-care-immigration https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/30/politics/fact-check-trump-fre...
- lazyeye 1y ago[flagged]
- amanaplanacanal 1y agoThat is certainly what JD Vance is claiming. He knows it's not true, but he keeps saying it because he also knows he can lie to his supporters and they either won't care, or won't actually try to find out the truth. Same with his lie that there are liberal groups funding people like the Utah shooter. It's complete bullshit and he knows it. He is one of the most sleazy people in politics right now, and that's saying something.
- AnimalMuppet 1y agoSo, we now have an assertion from you, and an assertion from the GP, and neither of you has supplied any evidence for your claims. Would one of you do so?
- amanaplanacanal 1y agoHere is one example from CNN: https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/30/politics/fact-check-trump-free-health-care-immigration https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/30/politics/fact-check-trump-fre... It's really not hard to find this information. All the major news sites are covering it.
- AnimalMuppet 1y agoThanks. But about your last paragraph: A post is written once, but read many times. If you make your readers look for the information, then N people have to do searches. If you search, it only has to happen once. So it's much more efficient for the post author to do so. And if you don't when you're contradicting someone else, and neither of you supplies evidence, then it looks like "he said, she said". If the evidence is on your side, show it.
- amanaplanacanal 1y agoThe information is everywhere. Anybody who can't find it doesn't really care.
- lazyeye 1y ago[flagged]
- amanaplanacanal 1y agoYou would be assuming wrong. The administration is lying, because otf they told the truth, nobody would support them. They are fucked and they are holding on by their fingernails. It's only a matter of time.
- Tadpole9181 1y agoFor the viewers at home, CNN is not remotely an "arm of the Democratic Party". They're owned by Warner Bros (and are one of the few American media conglomerates not directly beholden to a single partisan billionaire). Pretty much every single bias rater puts CNN as "slightly left leaning", and they are regularly under fire from the left for facilitating the normalization of alt-right or far right rhetoric. I'd love to hear what media sources you call unbiased.
- array_key_first 1y agoThis literally just does not exist. There's no middle ground here or anything - this is just made up. We don't spend federal dollars like Medicaid or Medicare on illegal immigrants. We literally just don't. If you think we do, remember: we don't. That doesn't happen. You are misremembering. That has never happened. If someone tells you that is happening, remember: they are wrong. They are lying. They don't understand what they are saying.