This. Why bother going through DD properly if you can just sue the seller later if it turns out everything isn't what you expected? I get that this is about th

This. Why bother going through DD properly if you can just sue the seller later if it turns out everything isn't what you expected? I get that this is about the seller lying during the sale process, which is appropriate imho, you shouldn't be able to just lie about stuff like this. But it's the DD team's job to spot this stuff, that's what DD is all about. I notice the judge criticised the bank as well, which is a step in the right direction.