"Public messages risk a wide audience seeing the message and recognizing it’s inappropriate, then taking action against the person, reporting them, or highlight

"Public messages risk a wide audience seeing the message and recognizing it’s inappropriate, then taking action against the person, reporting them, or highlighting the inappropriate messages for mob reprisals." You're defending this, as policing? > If you think not letting anonymous people talk to children Follow this rational to the end state, and we should all have to keep our kitchen knives chained to the counter because they might be used to stab someone. Let's ban chemistry cause someone might make a bomb. Everyone should wear helmets all the time cause they might trip and bump their heads. Dont tell me you're saving the children with the digital version of "papers please". Dont pass a law where "parenting" is the real and easy solution.