5 ms·
There should be a spaghetti cooker that works like a rice cooker. I put in the precise amount of water and then when it's all absorbed it signals me that it is
by themafia 1y ago
There should be a spaghetti cooker that works like a rice cooker. I put in the precise amount of water and then when it's all absorbed it signals me that it is done.
- laurencerowe 1y agoI've been cooking variations on this lazy Instant Pot spaghetti recipe for a few years now. I expect Italians would be horrified but it's extremely low effort and very tasty! https://thesaltymarshmallow.com/instant-pot-spaghetti/ https://thesaltymarshmallow.com/instant-pot-spaghetti/ I substitute the can of sauce for a 28oz can of tomatoes, and cook some onion and garlic in with mince instead of adding onion and garlic powder.
- culopatin 1y agoThe pictures are not selling that well at all. Looks about 2min overcooked.
- chongli 1y agoInstant Pot pasta is fun when you nail it but it’s so difficult to get right because the cook times vary so much with the quantity of food being cooked. If you’re like me and you vary the number of servings you cook all the time then the Instant Pot is pretty bad for this.
- adrian_b 1y agoYou do not really need a cooker with fancy sensors to achieve perfectly reproducible cooking. If you use a microwave oven for cooking, then for rice, pasta or any other kind of cereal-based ingredient, e.g. maize meal or semolina, you just need to determine once the correct amount of added water (e.g. for rice or maize meal I use water that is 4 times their weight, while cooking in a covered glass vessel), of microwave power and of cooking time in your oven. Then you can cook forever always using those parameters and the result will be just right every time.