What's ur opinion on adult neurogenesis? Do you think the progression of that article suggests that wikipedia is the model to follow for scientific information?

What's ur opinion on adult neurogenesis? Do you think the progression of that article suggests that wikipedia is the model to follow for scientific information? What about important and controversial historical events? Do you think that wikipedia omitting information is acceptable? Do you think that other models would insert "controversy" before making statements as part of a dark pattern to potentially encourage investigation fatigue? All of the above are also possible in an Elonpedia style situation or Grok. I never said it will be absolutely BETTER.