3 ms·
They could (in addition to banning Ads), require them to take bets from anyone not banned for misconduct by some neutral party.
by lokar 1y ago
They could (in addition to banning Ads), require them to take bets from anyone not banned for misconduct by some neutral party.
- dgfitz 1y agoI’m not going to defend bans, the industry is shady. People who get lucky once on a big bet shouldn’t get banned, or throttled, especially if they have a history of generally not hitting. To consider it neutrally, there are people who are just really, really good at it. Think a pro athlete playing on a JV sports team, a man among boys if you will. Those people are sincerely just fucking around with online books anyways and make most of their actual plays in-person, large stakes, and it is their primary source of income. I get why they get banned. These piddly online books aren’t “meant” for them. I don’t blame them for trying, it’s as close to free money as they can get. I also get why they get banned. Again, the industry is scummy and predatory. Not defending it. I can see both sides of it though.