2 ms·

I enjoy sports gambling. I’m sure people reading this won’t believe me, but I am “up” about 47% over the past 2 years, which is when I started. I’m good at it a

by dgfitz 1y ago

I enjoy sports gambling. I’m sure people reading this won’t believe me, but I am “up” about 47% over the past 2 years, which is when I started. I’m good at it and I have a system. I wholeheartedly agree with you, they need to ban advertising, as they did with tobacco. The amount of commercials and adverts is nauseating, the industry is predatory, and I’m having serious thoughts about stopping because of that.

lokar 1y ago
They could (in addition to banning Ads), require them to take bets from anyone not banned for misconduct by some neutral party.
- dgfitz 1y ago
  I’m not going to defend bans, the industry is shady. People who get lucky once on a big bet shouldn’t get banned, or throttled, especially if they have a history of generally not hitting. To consider it neutrally, there are people who are just really, really good at it. Think a pro athlete playing on a JV sports team, a man among boys if you will. Those people are sincerely just fucking around with online books anyways and make most of their actual plays in-person, large stakes, and it is their primary source of income. I get why they get banned. These piddly online books aren’t “meant” for them. I don’t blame them for trying, it’s as close to free money as they can get. I also get why they get banned. Again, the industry is scummy and predatory. Not defending it. I can see both sides of it though.
throwaway422432 1y ago
Agree with the banning, problem is they are major sponsors of a lot of sports which would then need to find alternatives for funding. AFL (Australia) is one with very embedded sponsorship from SportsBet. Even the voting group for the Norm Smith medal (best on ground in the Grand Final) has someone from SportsBet on it.
- vkou 1y ago
  > Agree with the banning, problem is they are major sponsors of a lot of sports which would then need to find alternatives for funding. They've managed to get by before sports betting was legalized.

by dgfitz 1y ago

lokar 1y ago

They could (in addition to banning Ads), require them to take bets from anyone not banned for misconduct by some neutral party.

dgfitz 1y ago
I’m not going to defend bans, the industry is shady. People who get lucky once on a big bet shouldn’t get banned, or throttled, especially if they have a history of generally not hitting. To consider it neutrally, there are people who are just really, really good at it. Think a pro athlete playing on a JV sports team, a man among boys if you will. Those people are sincerely just fucking around with online books anyways and make most of their actual plays in-person, large stakes, and it is their primary source of income. I get why they get banned. These piddly online books aren’t “meant” for them. I don’t blame them for trying, it’s as close to free money as they can get. I also get why they get banned. Again, the industry is scummy and predatory. Not defending it. I can see both sides of it though.

throwaway422432 1y ago

Agree with the banning, problem is they are major sponsors of a lot of sports which would then need to find alternatives for funding. AFL (Australia) is one with very embedded sponsorship from SportsBet. Even the voting group for the Norm Smith medal (best on ground in the Grand Final) has someone from SportsBet on it.

vkou 1y ago
> Agree with the banning, problem is they are major sponsors of a lot of sports which would then need to find alternatives for funding. They've managed to get by before sports betting was legalized.