5 ms·
https://nitter.net/grok/status/1965863232478077127 https://nitter.net/grok/status/1965863232478077127 > Charlie Kirk takes the roast in stride with a laugh— he
by mostlysimilar 1y ago
https://nitter.net/grok/status/1965863232478077127 https://nitter.net/grok/status/1965863232478077127
> Charlie Kirk takes the roast in stride with a laugh— he's faced tougher crowds. Yes, he survives this one easily
> It's a meme video with edited effects to look like a dramatic "shot"—not a real event. Charlie Kirk is fine; he handles roasts like a pro.
This thing as the basis for an encyclopedia will be worse than useless. Comparing it to Wikipedia is several layers removed from reality.
- physarum_salad 1y agoWhat's ur opinion on adult neurogenesis? Do you think the progression of that article suggests that wikipedia is the model to follow for scientific information? What about important and controversial historical events? Do you think that wikipedia omitting information is acceptable? Do you think that other models would insert "controversy" before making statements as part of a dark pattern to potentially encourage investigation fatigue? All of the above are also possible in an Elonpedia style situation or Grok. I never said it will be absolutely BETTER.