3 ms·
It's "unread", not "on read" by the way. I would not normally mention this type of correction, but I've noticed it more frequently and the two phrases are anton
by malnourish 1y ago
It's "unread", not "on read" by the way. I would not normally mention this type of correction, but I've noticed it more frequently and the two phrases are antonyms, unlike the common "lose"/ "loose" mistake.