3 ms·
Looks like an improvement over the M4 iPad of: Single Core: ~12% (3679 vs 4133) Multi Core: ~15% (13420 vs 15437) Which is in alignment historically
by alberth 1y ago
Looks like an improvement over the M4 iPad of:
Single Core: ~12% (3679 vs 4133)
Multi Core: ~15% (13420 vs 15437)
Which is in alignment historically with improvements from a new node improvement.
https://browser.geekbench.com/ios_devices/ipad-pro-13-inch-m4-9c-cpu https://browser.geekbench.com/ios_devices/ipad-pro-13-inch-m...
- pier25 1y ago> since M5 will be on the new (smaller) 2nm node AFAIK the M5 is still 3nm being produced at the TSMC N3P node.
- alberth 1y agoThanks, I updated my wording as such.
- red369 1y agoI frequently forget that the 2 nm naming has nothing to do with the physical size anymore. I hate that naming system. From Wikipedia: Node name Gate pitch Metal pitch Year 5 nm 51 nm 30 nm 2020 3 nm 48 nm 24 nm 2022 2 nm 45 nm 20 nm 2025 1 nm 40 nm 16 nm 2027
- pier25 1y agoI'm no expert but I think it's more related to the resolution of the photolithography process.