4 ms·
I did not explicitly evict the Postgres buffer cache, but using pg_buffercache to evict all buffers for the table, yields a runtime of 23ms for me (still going
by hans_castorp 1y ago
I did not explicitly evict the Postgres buffer cache, but using pg_buffercache to evict all buffers for the table, yields a runtime of 23ms for me (still going for the BitmapOr).
https://notebin.de/?ac3fcf55e6850f47#ERXndRrqp3X4zEWX5EC3dZUwdXzYhJd7QssK4dnSH3Kh https://notebin.de/?ac3fcf55e6850f47#ERXndRrqp3X4zEWX5EC3dZU...
Which plan does Postgres choose in your case that results 100ms?
- ethanseal 1y agoExactly the same one from what I see: https://github.com/ethan-seal/ors_expensive/blob/main/explain_plans/cold_or_explain_plan https://github.com/ethan-seal/ors_expensive/blob/main/explai... Given the buffer reads seem close to yours, I believe it's page cache.