3 ms·
Following this logic, I suppose that, in the future, cars that cannot automatically detect the presence of a child in a wheelchair and prevent the engine from s
by thw_9a83c 1y ago
Following this logic, I suppose that, in the future, cars that cannot automatically detect the presence of a child in a wheelchair and prevent the engine from starting will be banned.
- constantcrying 1y agoWhy are you being sarcastic about this. Obviously that will be a legal requirement at some point, just like constantly supervising the driver for tiredness is.
- thw_9a83c 1y agoI'm not being sarcastic. I'm predicting a trajectory of never-ending increase of regulatory requirements for any human activity which I don't like. Only big players have deep pocket for lobbyists and lawyers to avoid them or resources to implement them.
- pixl97 1y agoComplexity increases in every system till it fails. Avoiding this entropy may be impossible.
- sph 1y agoA dictatorship by bureaucrats is not a law of the universe. What used to work is that, when entropy increased on the governmental level, people would raise their pitchforks until something changes, for better or for worse.
- pixl97 1y agoThis almost never worked out for the people. Most of the time they king got pissy about it and stacked heads 10 deep. More so in the modern world if you turn off food and water for a few days you'd start stacking bodies like cord wood. We live in a very fragile state.
- t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y agoThat seems to be the end game. Increase regulations without decreasing them > regulatory capture > big corporations own / operate everything, nothing local / no small businesses.
- oldjim798 1y ago>Following this logic, I suppose that, in the future, cars that cannot automatically detect the presence of a child in a wheelchair and prevent the engine from starting will be banned. You said this like it is a bad thing, which is baffling? Obviously cars should do this. One of the best things about adding self-driving features is we can add features like this (and speed governors) to make cars a lot safer for everyone.
- p0w3n3d 1y agowhy overregulation is baffling to you?
- rimbo789 1y agoBecause it isn’t overregulation? Ensuring cars don’t kill people is a good thing. It’s proven from the last century of road deaths that people can’t actually drive them safely so automating safety is the next best thing. More generally I don’t think overregulation is really a thing. Just because you don’t see the use case for a rule doesn’t mean there isn’t one or it doesn’t serve some purpose. I think the last 40 years of removing rules have shown we are really bad at knowing where the line is.