4 ms·
> I don't see how the data presented necessarily leads to anything remotely close that conclusion with any real confidence. You are not providing a counterargu
by huijzer 1y ago
> I don't see how the data presented necessarily leads to anything remotely close that conclusion with any real confidence.
You are not providing a counterargument apart from the fact that "you don't see". Well. Thanks for sharing I guess.
- hshdhdhj4444 1y agoAnd OP is not claiming to provide a counter argument. They’re claiming, correctly, that the presented argument is invalid. They’re not even contesting the conclusions. Only that the information provided in the linked article does not justify the conclusion.
- sm1k 1y agoThis post is quite similar to tea leaf reading. There isn't a pattern explained by data, it doesn't exist. So there is no counter argument to provide apart from acknowledging the analysis presented in the post is totally bogus.