4 ms·

I don't see how the data presented necessarily leads to anything remotely close that conclusion with any real confidence. If anything the biggest H1B user - am

• huijzer 1y ago
  > I don't see how the data presented necessarily leads to anything remotely close that conclusion with any real confidence. You are not providing a counterargument apart from the fact that "you don't see". Well. Thanks for sharing I guess.
  • hshdhdhj4444 1y ago
    And OP is not claiming to provide a counter argument. They’re claiming, correctly, that the presented argument is invalid. They’re not even contesting the conclusions. Only that the information provided in the linked article does not justify the conclusion.
  • sm1k 1y ago
    This post is quite similar to tea leaf reading. There isn't a pattern explained by data, it doesn't exist. So there is no counter argument to provide apart from acknowledging the analysis presented in the post is totally bogus.
• jeremyjh 1y ago
  Yes, without knowing H1B beneficiaries in prior years its impossible to even conclude they've had a net add of them, since they have to be renewed every few years. I'm sure there are some net adds, but we have no idea how many.