Note that I initially replied to this: > But the moment that the AI can exceed a human programmer, at something as narrow as coding, then the company that has

Note that I initially replied to this: > But the moment that the AI can exceed a human programmer, at something as narrow as coding, then the company that has that AI shouldn't sell it to replace humans at other companies - it should instead use it to write programs to replace the other companies. That paragraph makes a very narrow claim, unlike your broad one about AGI.