3 ms·
Collectively, at least, people have always been fascinated by this idea of humanity, and the ideals it encompasses, but ten different people will have a differe
by nis0s 1y ago
Collectively, at least, people have always been fascinated by this idea of humanity, and the ideals it encompasses, but ten different people will have a different definition of what it means to be human. That’s fine, actually, because it demonstrates that people perhaps have ideas beyond biological impulses, and aspire to be more than feed-fuck-fight agents.
It’s understandable that we developed these traits (rather ironically) because at some point in the distant past the most important and pressing thing we did was band together to fight and kill megafauna, and that required all kinds of hard and soft skills.
Being able to throw projectiles with precision, communicate intent and purpose of moves during an attack, intuitively understand the danger a fellow group member might encounter (empathy), or caring for the wounded. All of this was done in the service of food, which helped our brains become what they are today.
I am skipping a lot of steps in between, but humans are set apart from the rest of the animal kingdom and whatever else today we call life on earth by our brain, and what it accomplishes, not just for us but others, including non-humans.
The most interesting thing our brains have thus far enabled is the capability to prod ponderables about the human condition, namely why do we live and die. Why is there something and not nothing. Nothing that asks these sorts of questions is bounded only by primal desires. But I think the sad part is that we’re often disappointed by the answers the universe provides.
Nothing is more telling of this than the stories we like to tell about ourselves, as many creation myths from different societies say all kinds of things about the origins of humanity, its purpose, or its final destination.
Humanity has all kinds of ideas about itself, and I hope it gets to live up to some of them.
- nis0s 1y agoTo clarify, cave paintings are a more human invention than cooking with fire, but we wouldn’t have gotten to cave paintings without first using tools and fire. So to the premise of the article in question, it’s not simply a matter of one of the other, or one over the other.
- fsckboy 1y agoif a chimp starts cooking with fire or instead starts cave painting, both are signs of progress but he's still a hunter gatherer. in the long run we can see the important contribution of many intellectual developments, but there may not be enough food/health surpluses for that to happen without eating cooked food. it's not useful to view evolution as "more important" moments, it's the totally of small changes in a dynamic hostile negative feedback environment.