2 ms·
We don't have an issue with profanity on HN but we do take out clickbait. Edit: ok you guys, I take the point and have put the original title back. More at htt
by dang 1y ago
We don't have an issue with profanity on HN but we do take out clickbait.
Edit: ok you guys, I take the point and have put the original title back. More at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45430354 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45430354.
- adastra22 1y agoReplace it with “what the cuss”?
- dang 1y agoThe word 'fuck' isn't the issue. The issue is that "What the fuck is AGI", as a title, doesn't add anything besides sensationalism to "What is AGI".
- adastra22 1y agoI don’t know. They typically read entirely differently to me, in the sense that what I would expect to see after clicking the link is different. I admit though the in this case “What is AGI?” better matches expectation to reality. Before I noticed the domain, “What the f*ck is AGI?” would have led me to expect more of a technical blog post with a playful presentation rather than the review article it actually is.
- UltraSane 1y agoIt communicates that the paper will probably be a lot less "stuffy" than the typical fancy science PDF
- blooalien 1y ago> "It communicates that the paper will probably be a lot less "stuffy" than the typical fancy science PDF" You pose an excellent point... I tend to agree.
- dang 1y agoI agree with blooalien - that's a great point. To me it doesn't feel quite enough to overcome the baity/provocative effects, but since several commenters have made good points about this, I we might as well put the original title back. I've kept "f*ck" in the title since that's in the original and arguably adds some subtlety in this case. Normally we'd replace it with the real word since we don't like bowdlerisms.