> The influence that a statistically flawed study can have over our collective futures is too dangerous. An even bigger danger: with all of the flawed / p-hack

> The influence that a statistically flawed study can have over our collective futures is too dangerous. An even bigger danger: with all of the flawed / p-hacked / over-hyped studies, the public (and the legislature) will start to believe that NO science is real. It worries me how much argument there is over things I consider to be facts. And how much effort goes into undermining science when it is not in the corporate interest (eg cigarette manufacturers funding “inconclusive” studies).