7 ms·
But the G in AGI is there for a reason. Any transition to essentially all AGI is going to involve people for a while. But the bulk of decision making and activ
by Nevermark 1y ago
But the G in AGI is there for a reason.
Any transition to essentially all AGI is going to involve people for a while. But the bulk of decision making and activity would move to the AGI rapidly.
The key is, suddenly intellectual labor has a nearly free marginal cost. Including the intellectual labor of managing different units, each with a different focus.
Where is the bottleneck?
Right now, human beings, our costs, limitations, individual idiosyncrasies, inability to scale, unreliability, down time, etc., are the most profound bottlenecks companies have.
- Yoric 1y agoAs of this day, AGI is faith, not a technology. If AGI ever arrives and is in any way cost-efficient, our entire society is obsolete and the only jobs that matter are pretty much mining and taking care of hardware until robots take over. That and techno-libertarian aristocrat, of course.
- tacitusarc 1y agoNote that I initially replied to this: > But the moment that the AI can exceed a human programmer, at something as narrow as coding, then the company that has that AI shouldn't sell it to replace humans at other companies - it should instead use it to write programs to replace the other companies. That paragraph makes a very narrow claim, unlike your broad one about AGI.