4 ms·

Better still, pay people for the use of their image in advertising Always

• collingreen 1y ago
  Right? Somehow we've let corporations (which arent even a real life thing! They are just groups of people!) be entitled to huge swaths of our lives. You want to use my image for your marketing because you don't want to pay models? Gtfo of here! What an insane thing to do to customers.
  • verisimi 1y ago
    It's almost like eroding privacy is a shared goal of corporations and government, and that both are fine with endlessly tormenting and selling out their customers/those they represent. It's as if they are the common person's adversaries rather and aren't helping or providing a service as they claim.
    • collingreen 1y ago
      I wonder how much of the government sponsored erosion of privacy is driven by the over empowered private sector still.
      • verisimi 1y ago
        The general understanding is that we do not live in fascism. However, I disagree. Government and corporations are clearly working together.
• aleph_minus_one 1y ago
  > Better still, pay people for the use of their image in advertising There exist sufficiently many people who love to have pictures of them being available publicly. Just look at basically some arbitrary Instagram page. Thus, there exists no need to pay (at least until, say, 95 % of society is really reluctant to have pictures of them publicly accessible).