3 ms·
That's a pretty pelican on a bicycle! https://jsbin.com/hiruvubona/edit?html,output https://jsbin.com/hiruvubona/edit?html,output https://claude.ai/share/618a
by mohsen1 1y ago
That's a pretty pelican on a bicycle!
https://jsbin.com/hiruvubona/edit?html,output https://jsbin.com/hiruvubona/edit?html,output
https://claude.ai/share/618abbbf-6a41-45c0-bdc0-28794baa1b6c https://claude.ai/share/618abbbf-6a41-45c0-bdc0-28794baa1b6c
- greenfish6 1y agopelican on a bicycle benchmark probably getting saturated... especially as it's become a popular way to demonstrate model ability quickly
- AlecSchueler 1y agoBut where is the training set of good pelicans on bikes coming from? You think they have people jigging them up internally?
- eli 1y agoAssuming they updated the crawled training data, just having a bunch of examples of specifically pelicans on bicycles from other models is likely to make a difference.
- AlecSchueler 1y agoBut then how does the quality increase? Normally we hear that when models are trained on the output of other models the style becomes very muted and various other issues start to appear. But this probably the best pelicans on a bicycle I've ever seen, by quite some margin.
- Kuinox 1y agoJust compare it with a human on a bicycle, you would see that LLMs are weirdly good at drawing pelicans in SVG but not humans.
- AlecSchueler 1y agoI thought a human would be a considerable step up in complexity but I asked it first for a pelican[0] and then for a rat [1] to get out of the bird world and it did a great job on both. But just fot thrills I also asked for a "punk rocker"[2] and the result--while not perfect--is leaps and bounds above anything from the last generation. 0 -- ok, here's the first hurdle! It's giving me "something went wrong" when I try to get a share link on any of my artifacts. So for now it'll have to be a "trust me bro" and I'll try to edit this comment soon.
- Kuinox 1y agoI never understood the point of the pellican on a bicycle exercise: LLMs coding agent doesnt have any way to see the output. It means the only thing this test is testing, is the ability of the LLMs to memorise. Edit: just to show my point, a regular human on a bicycle is way worse with the same model: https://i.imgur.com/flxSJI9.png https://i.imgur.com/flxSJI9.png
- mhh__ 1y agoMemorise what exactly?
- Kuinox 1y agoCoordinate and shape of the element used to form a pellican. If you think about how LLMs ingest their data, they have no way to know how to form a pellican in SVG. I bet their ability to form a pellican result purely because someone already did it before.
- throwaway314155 1y ago> If you think about how LLMs ingest their data, they have no way to know how to form a pellican in SVG. It's called generalization and yes, they do. I bet you could find plenty of examples of it working on something that truly isn't "present in the training data". It's funny, you're so convinced that it's not possible without direct memorization but forgot to account for emergent behaviors (which are frankly all over the place in LLM's - where you been)? At any rate, the pelican thing from simonw is clearly just for fun at this point.
- _joel 1y agoBecause it excercises thinking about a pelican riding a bike (not common) and then describing that using SVG. It's quite nice imho and seems to scale with the power of the LLM model. Sure Simon has some actual reasons though.
- imiric 1y ago
- _joel 1y ago... but can it create an svg renderer for claude's site.