3 ms·

So I guess that no other matter can receive attention if some people are homeless in the world?

• msl 1y ago
  Not so, but if you're to pick one company over all the others as being the most deserving of your ire, EA seems like a rather strange choice compared to, say, Nestlé [1], Chiquita [2], The Coca-Cola Company [3] or Shell [4]. One might even wonder if there isn't something wrong with your priorities. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_of_Nestl%C3%A9 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_of_Nestl%C3%A9 [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiquita#Criticism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiquita#Criticism [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Coca-Cola https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Coca-Cola [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_plc#Controversies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_plc#Controversies
  • throaway5445454 1y ago
    Well that's all well and good, but the ignorant masses who called EA the most evil company did so for basically the same reasons that you'd critique those other companies. Big corporations that put out productions designed to do nothing but take money from (often poor) people at the expense of their health. To me, the constant criticism of gamers over the issue reads like shilling for that pathetic open letter EA put out in response. Classic deflection from a toxic entity.