4 ms·
Because there isn't much point in being able to legally possess something you can't use. Edit: The comment I am responding to initially had some sort of "who c
by potato3732842 1y ago
Because there isn't much point in being able to legally possess something you can't use.
Edit: The comment I am responding to initially had some sort of "who cares" type question (the exact wording escapes me) in it to which I responded. It has since been edited making me look like I am answering a different a question about votes and responded to as if that is the case. I have left my initial response above this unedited.
- Jtsummers 1y agoIt's possible that this could turn into something permanent, but the current ban is only through Friday. Saturday, you'll be able to use it again.
- GJim 1y agoBizarre response. A temporary ban on use [1] does not equate to no point in legal ownership! [1] A temporary ban that isn't unreasonable given the circumstances; namely current Russian drone intrusions on Danish airports and national infrastructure. There *is* a war on you know!
- GJim 1y ago> The comment I am responding to initially had some sort of "who cares" type question It most certainly did not! My only edit is clearly identified and is asking why a comment I believed to be correct was downvoted. I want to know if I've made factual mistake so I can be corrected (no, I don't give a toss about imaginary internet points). However, it does appear my post is correct.
- rsynnott 1y agoThe road near my house is closed for roadworks for a weekend -> THE TYRANTS HAVE BANNED CARS. I mean, if this was a permanent ban, sure, but it's temporary. Temporary restrictions on airspace happen all the time for all sorts of reasons.