4 ms·
I could agree with your take that Windows Live Messenger, and Windows Live Spaces fit the description of a social network used in the patent. > "A social netwo
by ktsmith 14y ago
I could agree with your take that Windows Live Messenger, and Windows Live Spaces fit the description of a social network used in the patent.
> "A social network is any type of social structure where the users are connected by a common feature, for example, Google Plus. The common feature includes friendship, family, work, an interest, etc. The common features are provided by one or more social networking systems, such as those included in the system 100, including explicitly-defined relationships and relationships implied by social connections with other users, where the relationships are defined in a social graph 179. The social graph 179 is a mapping of all users in a social network and how they are related to each other. The social graph 179 is included in the memory 237 that is described below in detail. "
I would also argue that any competent attorney could argue that the other three MS services don't fit that description.
- molmalo 14y agoBut the fact that you can have at least one alias for your account (doesn't have to be from any other service), invalidates the issue. It's a social network (according to their definition) AND you can have different "identities" linked to the same account. Anyway, this kind of disputes won't be solved in an online forum. Besides, I don't think that MSFT and Google are willing to battle for this kind of issues right now. It could trigger a HUGE battle regarding all kind of assets (OS's, office suits, search engines, etc). Most probably, they would simply make a some kind of cross-licencing and forget the whole thing.