2 ms·
The phrase "erased history" isn’t morally neutral. It carries a tone of judgment, even suggests censorship. If the author had wanted to appear neutral, they wou
by olooney 1y ago
The phrase "erased history" isn’t morally neutral. It carries a tone of judgment, even suggests censorship. If the author had wanted to appear neutral, they would have used "deleted" or "removed."
- wizzwizz4 1y agoNeutrality, and the appearance of neutrality, are different things.
- AlecSchueler 1y agoAh! I read the article twice but hadn't considered the headline. I guess some editor wanted it sexed up a bit before it was published, the article itself is quite matter of fact.