4 ms·
Heh, you could be right on this one. But on the other hand, if I was the one filming and I knew a person in the frame wanted more privacy if possible I would be
by brna-2 1y ago
Heh, you could be right on this one. But on the other hand, if I was the one filming and I knew a person in the frame wanted more privacy if possible I would be glad to omit them or cut them out.
- crazygringo 1y agoBut you can already do that. This discussion isn't about what's polite. It's about what you think ought to be against the law. And being fined or thrown in jail if you break the law.
- brna-2 1y agoI was really thinking of imposing a framework where people know someones preference even when looking at the videos later. I would be fine even if there is no fine, if someone found me on one of your photos and say - look a lanyard, what a jerk for putting that online, without any additional consequence. EU came into my mind because of the existing GDPR and as a platform where this could be propagated. No I would generally not want anyone to go to jail even it the footage wracks my life somehow, but I would want a mechanism to broadcast my preference to the recording world.
- paulcole 1y ago> if someone found me on one of your photos and say - look a lanyard, what a jerk for putting that online, without any additional consequence You can wear a lanyard today!
- op00to 1y agoSure. They could simply ask you nicely and accept whatever the result is. This is the case now.
- paulcole 1y agoBut what if you weren’t glad to omit them or cut them out? What happens then?