3 ms·
IMO the issue is that we use the term "autism" for two wildly different things. We use it for perfectly functional people who are more sensitive than usual to c
by mort96 1y ago
IMO the issue is that we use the term "autism" for two wildly different things. We use it for perfectly functional people who are more sensitive than usual to crowds and noise and prefers a somewhat different style of communication than most people. And we use it for completely non-functional people who can't communicate at all and don't understand what's being communicated to them and throw violent temper tantrums as adults. I understand that there are probably reasons why these share the same medical term, but I believe we should use different colloquial terms for the two.
- jagaerglad 1y agothe "level 1, 2 or 3 autism" has started to gain colloquial traction recently
- kridsdale1 1y agoIsn’t that straight out of the DSM 5?
- depr 1y agoYes
- jwatte 1y agoWe had it, it was called "Aspie," but somehow that wasn't good enough.