4 ms·
In both examples given you can have 2 panels in series. So given that in almost all use cases, you can have 2 panels in series, they should just say “max 2 pan
by leoedin 1y ago
In both examples given you can have 2 panels in series.
So given that in almost all use cases, you can have 2 panels in series, they should just say “max 2 panels in series”. Simple.
A good product hides complexity from the user with sane defaults and optional advanced configuration. This feels like the same problem.
- cornholio 1y agoPanels are not standardized and are themselves series-parallel constructions with wildly diverse specs.
- TeMPOraL 1y agoThere's hiding complexity, and then there's creating fake reality for people. As it is, panels are gonna produce variable power depending on the weather. Putting interoperability with third-party panels aside, to get the simplicity of "max 2 panels in series", they'd have to either cap the max power on the panel/generator link and dump the excess, or set the limit based on the worst case a customer is likely to encounter. I.e. they're either gonna waste power, or gouge their customers for extra hardware. Neither of that makes sense for an ecological product sold to a price-conscious customer base :).
- namibj 1y agoThe problem is that you run higher voltages with the same hardware if your in Alaska than if you're in Florida. Substantially so. "Wasting" those 5~10% during severe winter conditions isn't worth splurging on the voltage converter. Though then selling units that suggest to not run a few hundred volt strings before paralleling instead does sound bad, as the string doesn't need separate fuses rated to many volts DC.