3 ms·
Why not release the source under AGPL (where 'network use' counts as distribution, unlike GPL), and offer commercial licences for those who want more favourable
by misswaterfairy 1y ago
Why not release the source under AGPL (where 'network use' counts as distribution, unlike GPL), and offer commercial licences for those who want more favourable terms?
https://fossa.com/blog/dual-licensing-models-explained/ https://fossa.com/blog/dual-licensing-models-explained/
The maintainer of libxml2, Nick Wellnhofer, will be moving all his future contributions over to an AGPL fork as corporate users of libxml2 were unwilling to contribute financially.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45288488 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45288488
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/issues/976#note_2538944 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/issues/976#note_253...