So you are not only stating than a LLM can replace a book. Directly you are saying that it is an axiom. It is so self evident true that you don't even need to

So you are not only stating than a LLM can replace a book. Directly you are saying that it is an axiom. It is so self evident true that you don't even need to reason about it. That LLMs can replace a book is a fundamental truth of the universe like the euclid postulates or like 1=1. Well then there is no way to continue the conversation, because by definition axioms can't be false.