4 ms·
What kind of argument is that!?
by spacechild1 1y ago
What kind of argument is that!?
- WalterBright 1y agoWho controls what territory in the world is hardly stable. At some point, if one is not a military power, one will have to take sides. If, for example, valuable resources are discovered in Greenland.
- spacechild1 1y agoWhat are you talking about? Greenland is already a NATO member (via Denmark), so it has already taken a side. The obvious scandal, of course, is that Greenland is being openly threatened by the US - a fellow NATO member!
- WalterBright 1y ago> Greenland is being openly threatened by the US Not really. It's just bluster.
- spacechild1 1y agoDenmark/Greenland certainly thinks differently. And empty threats are still threats.
- WalterBright 1y agoThere's been no followup on the "threat".
- spacechild1 1y agoFirst, a threat stays a threat, even if you don't "follow up". Second, there are stories about alleged covert CIA operations. The topic is certainly not off the table. Don't you see any problem with the US expressing desires to annex parts of a fellow NATO member, let alone not ruling out military action?
- gessha 1y agoThe Henry Kissinger argument.